.png)
8 hours ago
4
Jide Osuntokun
September 11, 2025 by Jide Osuntokun
About two weeks ago, the president of the United States, Donald Trump, suddenly came out with an executive order changing the name of the Defence Department to War Department to indicate, according to him that he wants the potential adversaries of the US to note that the gun is loaded to be used against any country or alliance that may challenge the United States.
Since the president is in possession of intelligence that may not be available to other people, it was conceded to him that he must have a reason for the aggressive change. However, the global political environment in recent times has not been conducive to peace. The Russian war on Ukraine despite the Alaska meeting of Putin and Trump has not relented. On top of this is the unfinished war against Iran and the cruel crushing war against undefended people in Gaza that is raising the temperature of every sane person in the world. On top of this is Donald Trump’s tariff war against every trading nation with the United States without discrimination between allies and enemies.
As if in reaction, though probably a long planned and scheduled programme, the People’s Republic of China mounted a celebration of power by staging a great display of military muscle in Beijing, celebrating the surrender of Japan in 1945 as if China was responsible for forcing Japan to surrender rather than the decisive United States dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
China invited most of the authoritarian regimes in the world like Russia, Turkey, North Korea and, surprisingly India that Trump’s policy has put in the wilderness by imposing 50% trade tariff to punish it for buying cheap crude oil and gas from Russia which is helping Russia to fund its campaign against Ukraine.
India, the most populous country in the world seems to be shifting its implicit alliance from the democratic world to the changing leadership of China in a new world order led by China. To indicate that the peace of the world is under some kind of threat, the recent changes in the democratic western alliance leads one to the belief that we are witnessing mobilisation for war unless care is taken.
Recently the British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said we were living in dangerous times. This was echoed by the new American Secretary of State for War Pete Hegseth. One would have said this was the usual exaggeration for which the Donald Trump crowd is known for. But coming from the British prime minister, one cannot simply dismiss it because this was a preambular statement to the launching of a new British Defence and Strategic Review document which is going to increase Britain’s defence spending to 3% of the country’s GDP. This will be well above the current 2%, still way below the 5% President Donald Trump is demanding from all NATO member countries even though the current amount the USA is spending is $895 billion just about 3.4%of its GDP which is way above the current expenditure on defence by the next three countries of China, $ 266.85 billion, Russia $126 billion and India, which comes fourth with an expenditure of $75 billion. From these figures, it can be seen that the USA alone spends more than the next three countries combined. The British prime minister’s statement was further explained by the Secretary of State for Defence, Right Honourable John Healey, who claimed that his country aims to build about 11 attack submarines, expand the carrying capacity of the British Navy and reinvigorate the air force by buying additional American-built F35 and increase the number of British-built typhoon aircraft and start recruiting people into the fighting force of the army while keeping the current men and women happy by improving their accommodation and stipends.
All these coming from a socialist government which traditionally preferred to spend money on social services indicate that its analysis on threat to the realm is serious. This of course should be taken in the context of the NATO members feeling about the unreliability of the USA as a partner because of the statements of Trump who has perhaps rightly been saying that American Defence partners must share the burden of defence and not expect America to carry their burden as it used to do hitherto. This sharing of burden on defence extends not only to NATO members alone but to Japan and South Korea and to the rich Arab oil kingdoms and to Israel where the Israeli tail wags the American dog!
As at the moment, Trump is prepared to fight future Israeli war against Iran and to possibly level the Persian theocracy down unless it kowtows to Israeli diktat and abandons its nuclear program. The current doctrine of expanding defence spending has also been embraced by the new German chancellor, Friedrich Merz who has publicly committed his country to go beyond 3% of GDP from its current low of below 2%. Merz has signed agreements with Ukraine to help it defend itself by building its own defence industry. The German posture on defence is influenced by President Putin’s aggression in Ukraine because ordinarily Germany is forbidden to rearm because of its militaristic past but in the current global context, the Western Alliance sees nothing wrong with Germany’s rearmament. For reasons of the big powers guarantee of Germany’s permanent disarmament, the Germans would probably have built their own nuclear arsenal for which they are capable of doing and the know-how of which they have. The current aggression of Russia in Ukraine has led to President Macron’s signing defence agreements with Poland in addition to the European Union’s opposition to the Russian threat.
All these coming after Trump’s bluff that has not impressed President Putin, it seems the Europeans are determined to defend themselves with or without American support. A coordination of British, French and German preparedness to defend their interests on the continent of Europe and their threat to seize accumulated Russian financial assets and investments in Europe may eventually force Putin to count the cost of his policy of rebuilding the lost Russian empire and the reconstruction of the collapsed USSR.
Recently the security conference in Singapore to which the Chinese virtually ignored by sending a low ranking delegation to witness, the campaign of rearmament carried to their door step with President Macron delivering the key note address and offering France’s support for their defence of democracy, and development for countries in South East Asia and warning those countries of the need to be prepared to defend their country’s autonomy. He also called on China to prevail on North Korea to stop its continued intervention on the Russian side in the current war between Russia and Ukraine on European continent.
The American Secretary of State for War Pete Hegseth was less diplomatic as characteristic of American “open diplomacy” established since the time of President Woodrow Wilson at the end of the First World War by openly accusing China of threatening Taiwan and the Philippines and calling on countries in Asia to be ready to resist Chinese communist threats by increasing their arms spending. He gave the impression that America is prepared to defend Taiwan which is against Trump’s campaign statement that he would not commit American troops to the defence of Taiwan. The Japanese and the South Koreans were not openly attacking China. But Japan in recent times seems to have abandoned its pacific policy to a policy of armed neutrality in Asia but is ready to protect the Japanese homeland. In the first Trump administration, the Japanese were publicly goaded to develop their nuclear umbrella. The Japanese did not publicly state their position apart from saying the American-Japanese treaty of defence was sufficient.
Read Also: First Lady unveils N20m ‘Green Nigeria Challenge’
My guess is that the Chinese does not have expansionist ambitions on the Philippines except to contest fishing rights on disputed islands in the South China Sea and Vietnam is capable of resisting Chinese ambitions. As for Taiwan, the eventual unification with the mainland is a foregone conclusion with or without America’s acquiescence.
To make the new Arms race palatable to the suffering electorate in Europe particularly in Great Britain, politicians are now talking of a new concept of “DEFENCE DIVIDENDS” meaning that with expansion of defence industries in their neighbourhood, jobs will be created for working class people who can either enlist in the armed forces or work in arms industries. The idea of defence dividends are not strange because when a country’s economy is put on war footing, there seems to be the appearance of full employment which is a false prosperity against which the post 2nd World war American president and previous Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during the Second World War, General David Dwight Eisenhower warned against when he advised his country against being taken over by the “military industrial complex“.
There is however no doubt that there is a growing hysteria about the possibility of an outbreak of war in Europe and the rest of us cannot just ignore it because of our distance from the current theatre of the conflict in Eastern Europe. However we can hope that like all other regional wars of the past since 1945, the Russian war in Ukraine will be contained because its spread and development into a nuclear confrontation is just too ghastly to be imagined. Even President Trump knows this and he is probably capable of palliating the military desire of his MAGA group by going to war against Venezuela and other weak countries in the Caribbean or South America accusing them of poisoning America people with their allegedly nefarious involvement in drug smuggling into the US which is less risky against a nuclear armed opponent.
English (US)